It is a curious fact, in need of explanation, that much of the world is currently cursed by awful leadership at once. Justin Trudeau, I would argue, is the worst prime minister Canada has ever had. Joe Biden is certainly in the running for worst US president. Francis is so historically awful as pope some Catholics wonder if he is a sign of the end times. Rishi Sunak in Britain is, at best, a technocratic cipher.
And why is it that, not so long ago, the US, Britain, and
the Catholic church all had outstanding leaders at once: Ronald Reagan, Margaret
Thatcher, John Paul II?
I am reminded of the adage, “hard times produce good men.
Good man produce easy times. Easy times produce weak men, Weak men produce hard
times.” This may be the cycle.
Reagan followed the appallingly pusillanimous Jimmy Carter
and his time of “malaise.” Thatcher followed a period of labour chaos presided
over by the forgettable Jim Callaghan. John Paul II followed the notoriously
prevaricating Pope Paul VI, the “Hamlet pope,” who seemed not to know his own
mind.
Conversely, Justin Trudeau came in following a period of tranquility
and prosperity, thanks to the fiscal discipline of Stephen Harper and, to some
extent, Paul Martin and Jean Chretien before him. Although Trump’s presidency
was superficially chaotic, Joe Biden followed a period of unusual peace and
prosperity under Obama and Trump. Francis was elected after JPII and the
intellectually impressive Benedict XVI.
I think this tendency to elect medicrities can be put down
to envy. In ordinary times, people do not want to vote for someone better than
they are. They will actually prefer a mediocrity. They turn to impressive
leaders only in an emergency.
This is especially a problem in the US Democratic party. The
party starts out representing the bottom half of the US IQ range: there is
truth to the old saying that anyone who is not a socialist in youth has no heart,
but anyone who is not a conservative once they grow up has no brain. And it is
positively founded on envy as its chief principle. So this coalition is going
to want to elect people with a lower than average intelligence. This explains a
lot.
Winston Churchill is the perfect example of this envy principle. He had been in
government for decades—but he was not popular with his colleagues. They
preferred to give the premiership to Neville Chamberlain, a dull mediocrity,
perfectly suited, as someone remarked, to be mayor of Birmingham. He blew with
the wind.
Only once in the most desperate crisis, did his country turn
to Churchill. As soon as the crisis passed, they turned away again, in favour
of another cipher, Clement Atlee, “a modest man,” as Churchill described him, “with
much to be modest about.”
The sin of envy is all-powerful; it holds us all back. it
tears down statues of the great. It holds human civilization back in
uncountable ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment