Playing the Indian Card

Friday, October 30, 2026

Culture Matters

A Haitian street scene


A while ago, I mentioned to a leftist friend that a big reason I chose to settle in New Brunswick was for the presence of French culture, which I loved growing up in Montreal, and sorely missed.

And his response was, “yes, cultural diversity is good.”

Wait—that’s not what I said. He was tacitly insisting that one culture, even subjectively, even in terms of personal preference, cannot be better than another. 

This is about as sensible as saying that all forms of transportation are equally good, or all governments or forms of government are equally good. A culture is a set of tools for a good life. One tool can always be better than another.

Surely no one has the right to deny the magnificent accomplishments of Greek culture, for example—a nation of only 10 million today. Any honest man must see the magnificent accomplishments of Jewish culture—only about 15 million today. 

RFK Jr. recently noted, in a speech, that the Muslim world has contributed almost nothing to world culture for the past several centuries, despite amounting to about 2 billion people. No Nobel prizes, no new inventions, no great literature, and no stable government. Something is wrong; this is a failing culture.

In a recent news report, El Salvador is sending troops into Haiti, to recover four of their soldiers kidnapped by a local gang. Haiti is always in chaos. This is a failed culture.

I have lived in a number of places around the world, and travelled to others. I certainly did not find life in all of these places equally comfortable, safe, or pleasant. I miss Korean culture mightily. I do not miss the culture of Qatar or Saudi Arabia. Other than money and consumer goods, there was so little there. When Geoguessr drops me somewhere in Europe, I am charmed. When Geoguessr drops me somewhere in Africa, or Indonesia, I am struck by the ugliness and disorder of the place.

Some cultures are actually harmful to mankind, and ought to be eradicated. One might cite Nazi Germany. Or, in Biblical times, Sodom, Gomorrah, or Canaan. Some proposed tools prove too dangerous. We no longer use asbestos as insulation, either. Or fly airships filled with hydrogen.

Of course, different cultures have specialties too—better in one sphere, worse in another. The French are unmatched for their visual sense, except perhaps by the Russians. The English are best at managerial systems and record-keeping. The Italians are best at cuisine. This is the great benefit derived by immigrant cultures like the USA, Canada, Australia, or Singapore. We can pick the best features from each, to form a new culture superior to all. 

Unfortunately, this advantage is being destroyed by the leftist doctrine of DEA, multiculturalism, and cultural equality. Germans or Scots may have a strong tradition in engineering; but we must not hire Germans or Scots, they are overrepresented. Instead, we must hire some sub-Saharan African. This is a fine way to destroy a culture.

The counter-argument given at this point by the left is that these failed or less successful cultures are in the state of poverty and chaos they endure because of colonialism; because they were exploited and possibly infantilized by the Europeans.

That will not wash. In any place you might name, the Europeans left generations ago. Somalia became independent in 1960. Haiti became independent in 1804. They have been in chaos ever since. Compare Spain: Columbus discovered the Americas the very year Spain managed to fully decolonize from the Moors. Within a generation, they were the world’s greatest power. The Dutch Republic achieved independence from Spain in 1648; they had already started to develop an East Indian empire in 1604. The Irish keep winning Nobel Prizes for literature—despite centuries of suppression of Irish culture and economic exploitation under Britain. They only achieved independence in 1921. Germany has risen from ashes since 1945, and twice since 1918. Korean culture was systematically suppressed by Japan until 1945—look where they are now. And the Jews—they emerged from genocide only in 1945 to re-establish their present prominence. 

The original premise of world colonization by Europe was actually that they were there to introduce peace, order, human rights, and a better way to less accomplished lands. To build railroads and canals and civil government. 

The results in many lands once they pulled out seem to validate this assumption. One can see the decline of Zimbabwe since majority rule; one can see the fall of South Africa. One can see the political chaos and repression in the Muslim world.

And perhaps the most obviously failed cultures of all are those currently glorified as “indigenous” or “aboriginal.” Cultures that never emerged from the stone age, never invented the wheel or writing, and were at near-constant war. Not smart or kind to want to preserve them.




Wednesday, October 28, 2026

What Others Think of Us




In my work, I get to talk to a lot of people from China, both in China and in Canada. I had an interesting talk with one last night. He himself travels regularly between Canada, China, and Europe.

He lamented that Canada and Western Europe were destroying themselves with “woke politics.” He said Chinese people used to think Europe was clean, orderly, and safe. Now they are afraid to visit. He believes Europe cannot be saved now; it is too late. He is grateful that there is no woke attitude in China. 

He finds DEI appallingly unjust and harmful to development.

He thinks Muslim immigration is a problem. 

He thinks Brampton is not a good place to visit or to live; dirty and dangerous because of the South Asian immigrant population.

He thinks it is a mistake to bring in so many low-skilled immigrants.

He thinks censorship is worse in Canada now than in China.

He thinks Canada is on a rapid downward slide. He thinks the best thing to do would be to join the USA.

Just so you know what the Chinese man in the street thinks...


Saturday, October 17, 2026

A Word on Feminism

 

Betty Friedan

Having lived abroad for some years, I have perhaps some distance, some objectivity. I can say that feminism has ruined North American women. 

It has set up any relationship for them as a struggle for power—“the personal is political.” No room for mutual support; no room for affection. Men are the ancestral enemy. They must be made to submit. They must submit to the woman in all situations.

This is seen as well in the “Karen” phenomenon. This is an assumption of power: each woman considers herself the ultimate authority on everything, and everyone else must defer to her.

This certainly does not work for men. A relationship with a woman means surrendering his freedom entirely to her leadership—and freedom is far more important for men than for women. And what does he get in return? A mother for his children? She’s not interested. Pregnancy and childrearing are oppressive—“barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen.” Therefore children are resented. She will abandon them to strangers for the sake of her career, if she does not abort them.

So, he loses freedom, gets no affection or respect, does not get a stable home life, and she may leave him at any time, and take the house and kids. He has invited an enemy into his life, into his home, into his bedroom.

But interestingly, this does not work for women either. Surveys suggest women are less happy than they used to be in pre-feminine societies. Women do not naturally crave independence and leadership—these are male values. They naturally crave security, affection, and human contact: the things feminism has turned them away from. 

This itself illustrates why women should not lead in the home: they lack a natural sense of direction, literally, figuratively, and in all spheres. They are hard-wired instead to be flexible, and to follow the leader. Feminism has become the leader, and they are following it, against their better interests, right off a cliff. And, as they have assumed leadership in the family, they are dragging men, children, and society as a whole off that cliff with them.