Who I Think Is on the Epstein List

 

BFF?

I have no business speculating on the Jeffrey Epstein list, but here’s my speculation.

I believe the most plausible reason the Epstein client list or its equivalent has not been released is that he was an intelligence agent. Exposing more would destroy some intelligence operation.

This would explain how he became rich despite no relevant background.

He was not, I speculate, Mossad, as some are suggesting. Seems to me the point of his Lolita Island was that it took him off the US coast; the CIA is not allowed to operate within the US. If he were with Mossad, there would not be this need. Mossad may come up only because of antisemitism. It fits with the eternal trope of an International Jewish Conspiracy.

And the Trump administration would not have great incentive to avoid blowing up an Israeli intelligence operation.

The names we hear of, supposedly among the Epstein clients, tend to be famous Americans. This suggests a deep state coup.

And the failure of the Trump administration to release the information suggests that the CIA has some means of controlling them as well.

The obvious explanation is that Trump too is on that client list. Allan Dershowitz says he has seen the list, and it includes some people pointing fingers at others for being Epstein clients. That could include Trump.

Countering this, it is said that Trump actually blew the whistle on Epstein originally, and cooperated with investigators when others would not. And the fierce opposition to Trump by the deep state and the media seems best explained by the thesis that they had nothing on him, that they felt they could not control him.

So we’re back to an intelligence operation.

It may be that the speculation centres around famous Americans only because of the natural local bias of the media. It is an old saw in journalism: you always want a local angle. Three locals dying in a car accident is more newsworthy than 300 people dying in a bus crash in Bangladesh. It may be that the bulk of Epstein’s actual clients were foreigners—like Prince Andrew, the one person actually identified so far.

Epstein visited Israel and was introduced by Dershowitz to government figures there? Don’t assume from that he was working for the Israelis. The simpler assumption, per Occam’s razor, is that he was working for the CIA to set honey traps for Israeli politicians.

I think the reason the Trump administration will not release the list is that it will include the names of prominent foreign allies. A Trudeau, a Macron, a Netanyahu, a Boris Johnson, or the like. 

The Hellfire Club

 

I have heard both Vivek Ramaswamy and Jacob Rees-Mogg say recently that nobody is actually in control in Washington; there is nobody actually pulling the strings behind Joe Biden. Instead, it is a “mechanism,” according to Ramaswamy; Rees-Mogg says a “blob.” 

How does tis mechanism work, though? How does a blob coordinate the actions of many on many levels?

I think behind it, there must be something like a Hellfire Club; of which we actually heard in the Jeffrey Epstein revelations. We even know what they’re up to: the main lure is sex, especially sex with minors. Once someone has been compromised by participating, there is really no further need for coordination. The need to protect all other members, and the secrets of the club, becomes automatic, and dictates the necessary actions at all levels.

And this must be why they are so determined to stop Trump: he is not compromised. He is not a member of the club. In power, he might blow the lid off. It is not about political ideology. Trump is only a moderate Republican. They are similarly afraid of RFK Jr. on the left; or Tulsi Gabbard. 

I believe they killed Stanley Kubrick for obliquely revealing their existence in Eyes Wide Shut. Of course, they killed Jeffrey Epstein. They will try to kill any non0member who gets close to the highest levels of power, or anyone who, once a member, looks likely to reveal any secrets. 

Surely this will all come out soon. It is getting too obvious that this is going on.

The Deep State Took Out Nixon?

 

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1781736785757806911

Shaken, Not Stirred

 

Stuff is happening. The videos of the January 6 events are coming out. Jeffrey Epstein’s client list is presumably coming out. X has broken the censorship. The polls are turning, and half the world is going into elections. You see a growing list of prominent people coming out as on the right, or moving from apostasy to faith. To cite one example, Dr. John Campbell, who seemed at the beginning of the pandemic such an establishment figure, has evolved into a radical, no longer trusting government. Or look at Elon Musk, previously the great champion of the left who was going to give us all electric cars.

I personally have found myself being contacted recently by old acquaintances who had previously informally written me off as a Catholic of intolerably “right-wing” opinions. And they’re acting like old friends.

I’ve been predicting it for ages; people are always slower on the uptake than I expect. But this year feels like the year. The wokery have lost the moral high ground, and have lost touch with reality to a point that is impossible not to mock. They are no longer cool. Soon no one will admit to ever having been on the left.

Someone has put together time-stamped video of the January 6 events, to show the overview. Of course, what they show is still selective, crafted to discredit the official “narrative.” But it seems clear that Trump had nothing to do with what went on at the Capitol, that it was organized and controlled by a few individuals, most obviously Ray Epps; that Epps and others orchestrating affairs were pretty obviously federal agents; that the police were undermanned and underequipped, either from incompetence or in order to create an incident. And the demonstrators, most not intending to do anything but demonstrate, but lacking their own leadership, look as though they just foolishly and impulsively fell into a trap. 

I suspect it was an insurrection, but an insurrection comparable to the Reichstag fire: an inside job, an insurrection by some party in the deep state exploited if not created to seize more power. 

As they have been doing since.

And the same, fairly obviously, could be said of the supposed “occupation” by the truckers in Canada. I cannot believe it was all organized by the government, but it was provoked, mischaracterized, and exploited to seize additional powers by those already in power. I mean, seriously: a slickly-produced Confederate flag at a Canadian truckers' rally? What significance would it have to a bunch of Canadian truckers? Southern pride? Yay slavery?

Or, indeed, the same looks suspiciously possible now of the Covid lockdowns; or even of Covid itself. No conspiracy theory seems too fanciful any longer. There are bad actors in government, and they want more power.

RFK Jr. suggests the real insurrection happened with the Kennedy assassination. The current upheavals are because they feel their power threatened by the common people. They fear Trump, because he is not their guy, not beholden to them and not susceptible to blackmail. They never expected him to win that election in 2016. Now they realize preserving the machinery of democracy is too dangerous. The people are no longer as easily led, and no longer to be trusted.

Scott Adams argues that, once you create an espionage organization within government, as the US did during WWII, and expanded for the Cold War, their seizure of power is inevitable. It is only a matter of time.

The default assumption is that it has already happened. Now we are seeing it, and it may be falling apart.

Sex and the Deep State

The Sixties

A friend sends along this link from American Thinker. A lot of great insights here. Some stuff that had never occurred to me. 

“Our divorce regime is a unilateral divorce regime. Anyone who wants a divorce gets to have one: The State always takes sides with the party who wants the marriage the least. The State incentivizes disloyalty and infidelity between spouses.”

“The injustices of the unilateral divorce regime have been known for a long time. The Deep State could, at any time, enact divorce by mutual consent. Yet, they do not.”

“Delaying childbearing has become the cost of entering the professions. That means many of our most successful and visible and influential people have used contraception or abortion. They literally cannot imagine what their lives would be without it. Journalists, lawyers, foundation officers, business executives, and politicians all join hands to protect the Abortion Industry from skeptics like David Daleiden.”

I do disagree, though, with the basic premise, that the Sexual Revolution was imposed from above by elites in order to seize more power.

I think it came from all of us, and it was far simpler. The attraction was the promise of sex on demand and without consequences. Couldn’t be clearer, really: “free love!”

To make it work, you then had to kill the traditional sex roles and make men and women interchangeable; the traditional roles required that women and men worked in tandem in a family unit. You had to subvert the family generally. Family, commitment to one partner and to children, went directly counter to random access to sex. It became the enemy. 

You also had to go for unrestricted abortion, and then—hey, if murder is okay, where are the limits?

Instead of sin being condemned, now it was “conventional morality,” or any appeal to morality, that was condemned. The whole gay and trans thing has been an attempt to discredit conventional morality as “discriminatory.” So, for that matter, is the overall attack on “Western civilization,” as though it were a blight upon human history. The target is the Judeo-Christian moral tradition.

This rejection of morality was simply more dangerous when embraced by the elites. If morality is no longer a constraint, the elites are free to pursue pure self-interest. They can just go for power and possessions.

It is also in their self-interest, now, to destroy the family, and religious authority, and even thinking for oneself, as rival power centres.

And so here we are.