Not only did Big Tom believe in evolution from the apes: he deliberately made himself look like a capuchin monkey. |
In the recent past, I pointed out that Evolution was no new idea with Darwin, but had been a live theory since ancient Greece. And I noted that St, Augustine assumed it. Now I discover, thanks to TOF's blog, that St. Thomas also assumed it. The money quote from Summa Theologica:
Species, also, that are new, if any such appear, existed beforehand in various active powers; so that animals, and perhaps even new species of animals, are produced by putrefaction by the power which the stars and elements received at the beginning.
-- Summa Theologica, I.73.1 reply3
Aquinas differs from Darwin only in the mechanism, which he imagines to be "putrefaction." St. Thomas also argues nicely that evolution is the most fitting way for God to create: creating things that can themselves create other things is an intrinsically greater feat and greater good than just creating everything all at once.
The idea that there is some conflict between Christianity and evolution per se is plain wrong. The problem, for some, is with Darwin's proposed mechanism. These two issues ought not to be confused.
1 comment:
Thanks for this post. I do have a question, at least for St. Thomas Aquinas and perhaps you can answer it too: WHY would it be "an intrinsically greater feat and greater good than just creating everything all at once"?
Post a Comment